Month: May 2018

Most attorneys and law firms don’t fully leverage the power of the Internet. They think of their website as an extended brochure that is placed in cyberspace to (hopefully) be stumbled upon by a prospective client.  Once the client finds the website, he is then bombarded by facts, figures and information about the ATTORNEY and […]

Some time ago Bills of Cost published in a newsletter to client’s the dreaded situation in respect of the recovery of costs in Rule 43 proceedings ( with specific reference to Rule 43 (7) & (8 )) and the potential devastating financial implications these extreme limitations placed on the recovery of Attorneys and Counsel’s charges […]

“The act of perusing or considering a document or letter should be held to mean the application of a trained legal mind to the contents of the document in question.” – Thornycroft Cartage Co v Beier & Co (Pty) Ltd & Another 1962 (3) SA 26 (N) “The fee for perusing is for the professional consideration […]

Parties embroiled in litigation often has to call on the expertise of their Counsel to consider the evidence at hand for trial purposes. The question that now arises is : Whether the costs of employing Counsel to consider and give advice on evidence is recoverable from the other side should a party be successful and be […]

As many Attorneys may be aware, the sometimes unavoidable Rule 43 proceedings that follow matrimonial proceedings can easily take up more of the Attorney and Counsel’s time than the actual divorce case itself. To add salt to the wound, the costs of conducting Rule 43 proceedings almost always exceed those of the divorce proceedings by […]

The relationship between a Client and an Attorney is really the same as that of a principal and a special agent. The agent is entitled to be remunerated, but as an Attorney is an Officer of the Court, if called upon to do so, the Court retains the right to decide what a fair and […]

You may have heard the concept of ‘cloud-based computing’ or ‘cloud-based application’ being used for some time now. You’d be forgiven for not knowing too much about what this entails, however, because a coherent definition in laymen’s terms can be elusive. ‘Cloud’ is simply a nickname for the Internet, and so the term lends itself […]

We find that often when in a taxation situation (whether presenting or opposing a bill), many attorneys and their PAs or clerks still struggle with the question of the proper principle upon which costs should and should not be taxed. When dealing with Party and Party costs the situation is fairly straight forward: one party […]

So, you have been successful for your client, have obtained a cost order in their favour and are at Taxation to recover all of the costs you incurred during your efforts. Chances are you will be in for a bit of a shock as the Taxing Master, on the day, may well disagree with many […]

It’s all too common, especially in complicated matters, that one or both of the parties finds themselves employing the services of two Counsel, the costs of which usually end up being substantial, whether the case was won or lost. As per Rule 69, a party does not need a special order or permission to employ […]